When we reported to you in November what was proposed for “Tax Reform,” there were some proposals which would definitely hurt the Real Estate Market. The final version which is now law has many Realtors & Real Estate Groups concerned that it will negatively impact values and long term growth. I DON’T see that happening in Santa Clarita.
Watch to learn why…
The Santa Clarita Valley industrial market is heating up, with a growing number of companies acquiring new warehousing, manufacturing, and logistics space. At the same time, builders are beginning to complete some large-scale projects, creating an environment that is dynamic and rapidly changing.
Last year, the business community absorbed almost 350,000 square feet of the region’s spare industrial capacity, one of the largest figures of the past decade. In the Valencia Gateway alone, more than 250,000 square feet were absorbed.
Prominently, much of this activity was from companies already located in the Santa Clarita area. Two examples are Accurate Freight Systems and Pharmavite, each of which moved into facilities of more than 50,000 square feet. Firms like these typically cite several reasons for expanding within the local community, including its growing pool of available workers and its competitive lease rates.
Across California, job markets are getting tight, and companies are struggling to attract qualified employees. In most of the state, almost everyone who wants a job already has a job, forcing companies to recruit workers from their competitors or hire people from other cities.
But the population of the Santa Clarita Valley is growing rapidly, creating a steady influx of talent and making it easier for companies to hire.
Compared to the rest of L.A. County, the SCV also has some of the most affordable industrial lease rates, with average rates that are more than 30 percent cheaper than Central L.A. and 15 percent cheaper than the San Fernando and San Gabriel Valleys.
In response to growing demand, builders are ramping up their construction activity, delivering a substantial amount of new capacity to the market. In 2017, several industrial structures were completed, totaling almost 400,000 square feet of space. More is underway, and with an average of 700,000 square feet under construction throughout 2017, additional completions are expected in 2018.
As companies begin to fill this new space, jobs will be created in several industry sectors, including logistics and transportation. Over the past year, jobs in the logistics industry have expanded at an accelerated rate, as consumers increasingly shop online and have goods delivered to their homes. Logistics services tend to be concentrated in the Central Valley and Inland Empire, but some of this activity is moving to the SCV to take advantage of its proximity to the ports, and to be close to the L.A. County consumer base. During 2018, the SCV logistics industry will expand faster than the overall labor market, and is expected to offer above average wages and salaries.
For more valuable insight into the local, state, national, and even global – YES, global! – economies and how they’ll be impacted by the growth and development on the horizon, register for the 2018 Economic Outlook Conference. Scheduled for Thursday, March 8, 2018, from 2 – 5 p.m. in the beautiful Valencia View Room at the Tournament Players Club in Valencia. Regular registration is $125 and walk-in registration the day of the event is $150. Space is limited!
About the Author: One of the featured 2018 Economic Outlook Conference speakers, Dr. Mark Schneipp from the California Economic Forecast, provides economic analysis and forecasting for a wide range of clients including businesses, non-profits, cities, regional organizations, colleges and universities. The California Economic Forecast’s special areas of expertise include regional economic analysis, economic evaluation of regions using local indicators, and longer-term forecasting of California counties. Dr. Schneipp will provide an in-depth forecast for the Santa Clarita Valley at the upcoming Outlook event.
About the SCVEDC: The Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation (SCVEDC) is a unique private / public partnership representing the united effort of regional industry and government leaders. The SCVEDC utilizes an integrated approach to attracting, retaining and expanding a diversity of businesses in the Santa Clarita Valley, especially those in key industry clusters, by offering competitive business services and other resources.
By now you have probably heard that the current tax plans being voted on by Congress have chosen to target homeowners that use interest and property taxes to reduce their tax bite as deductions that need to be reduced or go away entirely. Yesterday the House passed their plan and the Senate is soon to follow. It’s been a long time since we have had changes to tax law that so squarely affect Real Estate, but for many of this, make no mistake it will cost us thousands of dollars each year. And if you listen to the Real Estate Lobby, whatever version of the two laws is formally adopted (something that will almost certainly happen in the next few weeks), may cost some of us in the value of our home. I’ll touch on both here but to be sure, my views are neither Red nor Blue but Green. In other words, who is this going to hit financially, and I think it’s pretty clear California is at the top of that list. In fact, it’s been a long time since I’ve had so many of my great past clients call about one topic like they have about this. So, for this year end blog post I will attempt to answer the 3 questions that have been raised the most and in 2 weeks you will get a video interview from me on this topic. Of course, nothing is yet finalized but it’s clear that despite a lot of uproar from California and a few other states change is going to happen and it’s going to cost some of us some money.
Let’s start with what is being likely to be enacted and the answer to the first question which is when will this start?
First, if the House bill is approved, you will only be allowed to deduct interest on up to $500,000 of loan. Meaning if you have a loan of more than that (and for a lot of people in our valley, it can be a lot more than that), you will no longer be able to deduct that interest. Next is even bigger -the property tax deduction. The House bill caps the amount of property taxes you can deduct to $10,000 and the Senate bill eliminates the property tax deduction completely. That is the far bigger issue for many people that have either no loan or a very small loan in which interest deduction may not cost them much. EVERYONE pays property taxes and for some, it’s a BIG number. Further, and a lot of people aren’t really talking about this, the new laws would require you to own a home for FIVE years, not the current two years, to avoid paying capital gains should the home go up in value. Want to further reduce the amount of homes coming up for sale and reduce the amount of Real Estate transactions? This part of the tax reform does this for sure. Also, for those fortunate enough to own second homes, no more interest deduction for you and if you have a home equity line, bye bye deduction. This will all start next year under the current plan. There are some other issues that will affect builders and low-income housing but these are the ones that affect you and I.
Second, how much will this cost me? To be sure for many Americans, the answer is effectively zero. Over one third of our country doesn’t own a home. Another third owns but with no mortgage. The elimination of a Mortgage Interest Deduction means nothing to them. But the reduction or worse ELIMINATION of the property tax deduction is a different story. Everyone that owns a home pays property taxes and though they don’t all itemize, for people in expensive states like California, New York and Illinois it’s a major incentive to home ownership and losing it can cost a bunch. Before writing this, I went back over the last 2 years and counted how many homes I sold over $700,000. It was 180. Over 1 million was 39. Losing the property tax deduction alone will cost each of these families over $10,000 each year. Of the 39 homes I sold over 1 million, all but 4 had loans over $500,000 and many had loans over $900,000. Losing the mortgage interest deduction for many of them will cost thousands each year. The median price point in LA County is almost $560,000. In Orange County it is over $750,000. It’s safe to say that the higher in price point we go the bigger the financial hit and for some it could very easily mean over $7,000 year in real dollars lost to them. One client buying a home for $1,120,000 who is closing this year and has loan of $850,000 (closing this year means he keeps the current 1.1 million interest deduction limit) figures closing next year would cost him over $50,000 in real dollars in the 7 years he plans to own that home in mortgage interest alone. Make no mistake, this will mean a lot of financial benefit to homeowners in expensive areas like Santa Clarita will be lost.
Third, what will happen to the value of my home? This is really one that in the short term it’s hard to see it affecting the value of homes in Santa Clarita under $650,000. We still live in market in which it’s expected we will have another year of appreciation in 2018 solely due to short supply and at least steady demand. Between $650,000 and 1 million will likely be affected somewhat, especially with move up buyers that will now lose at least some of the financial benefit of moving up and buying bigger. Instead of buying a home for $850,000 they may see if they can get a larger home in the $750,000 range. One thing I have noticed since the mortgage meltdown is buyers are more conservative than ever. They often buy less, sometimes a lot less home than they can afford. Further, they are well aware of exactly how much that new home will cost them and exactly what their write offs will mean to them based on their tax bracket. I make sure all buyers know these numbers as do all good lenders. Last, the over 1 million dollar market will be affected and potentially quite a bit. It’s already the part of the market that has the lowest number of buyers in SCV, obviously. Now you either limit or take away entirely tens of thousands in financial incentive to buy those homes? How could it not? I deal with a fair amount of well off people and to be sure, for many they will invest in Real Estate and their own home will continue to be an important part of that. But this group is also very smart with money and now changes are being made that reduce the incentive to buy bigger. And the second home market? Look out in areas that rely on that. Long term it could be argued that the under $650,000 price point could also be affected. One of my favorite exercises with first time buyers is educating them how by writing off interest and property taxes they can often buy for less than what it costs to rent, or get a home for the same effective cost per month as an apartment. Based on what the final version of this reform looks like, that can change now too.
I realize that this is a difficult topic to analyze and predict what may happen. Many politicians are claiming that a lot of good will come from it. I always question what any politician says, but hopefully there will be positives that affect all income sectors. To be sure though it’s hard to see how it will help homeownership, stimulate home building, reduce costs to purchase or any other obvious economic drivers. If it negatively impacts property values, that won’t be seen as a positive by homeowners either. There is a lot more to this reform that will affect a number of other entities, specifically schools and nonprofits. I won’t comment on any of that. What I will say is that whatever the final signed legislation is will cost many Santa Clarita homeowners some real money.
For the last 3 years, we have experienced a shortage of quality homes for sale in Santa Clarita. That’s no big surprise, “tight inventory” is all over many real estate related reports. It is for that reason that 2016 was the fourth year in a row of price appreciation, especially in the lower price ranges. Too many buyers for too few homes caused about 10% appreciation for the year. At some point, of course, this will stop, but it’s hard to imagine it happening anytime soon. Today, we have under 400 resale homes and townhomes for sale in a valley of over 200,000 people. Even adding in the 11 new construction projects and their available homes leaves us with about 40% of what would be needed for a “normal” 4-month supply of homes. Meaning, that a marketplace in which multiple offers are common will likely be around for a while.
It is in this kind of supply/demand environment that we often see a new listing come up and there be multiple buyers making offers for that property. That is what today’s post is about, as I regularly see sellers and their agents mishandle this opportunity. Worst case, they take the first offer that comes in, something happens in escrow and 30 days later they have to come back on the market. So many times I’ve seen that cost sellers tens of thousands of dollars and untold aggravation. That can be avoided, though, by following some important tips that give the best possible outcome for buyer and seller alike. Let’s assume then, that the seller wants not just the best possible price, but also TERMS that lead to the time-frames they need and a smooth escrow without surprises or disappointments. I’ll offer a few tips to buyers at the end, but this is mostly for those that plan to sell in a tight inventory market like we have today.
It is my experience that if a seller wants top dollar, that almost always comes in a multiple offer situation during the first month that the property has been for sale. I’ve heard many homeowners say they think a home was sold under market value because it sold right away, and that certainly has happened. Rarely does that happen, though, when the agent involved makes sure that ALL buyers in the marketplace see the new listing, and it stays on the market for a designated period of time – not just a day or two. In fact, almost always when a home sells right away for less than it could have, it is because the listing agent sold it to the first offer in the first few days on the market and, SURPRISE, often to their own buyer so they can get all of the commission. This happened so many times in the short sale market of 2009-2012 that banks today INSIST a home be on an auction website to ensure that the home can be bid on. For today, the tip is simply this – have your agent put in the remarks that the new listing will be open for viewing for a specific period of time (i.e. 7 days, 10 days or 2 weeks). Give those buyers and their agents a chance to get in and not feel rushed to jam an offer in right away. Encourage everyone to come and offer if qualified and interested. This creates a comfort zone to view and buy and still keeps the urgency up to get offers in. This all but guarantees that every buyer that is in the marketplace sees it, which is the key to getting top dollar.
Next, any prospective buyer should be encouraged to write and put their best foot forward to start with. This way you learn their true motivation. Once all offers are received, tip #2 is to write a “multiple counter offer” with respect to the buyers’ highest/best price and terms. It floors me how often agents don’t do this, and while there can be reasons to just accept a solid offer, why not find out what each offer’s best price and terms are? It simply takes an extra day or two, and a one page form. I prefer asking for “highest and best” as opposed to asking for a specific price, because this encourages buyers to truly give their best price, rather than meeting a specific number. You never know what that will be! Giving a “multiple counter offer” is also important to determine what the second-best offer is to be a potential “back up offer” in case something happens with buyer #1. Again, just because you are the hot new listing doesn’t mean things can’t happen in escrow, and you want to be prepared if they do. For buyers, this is where a “cover letter” detailing your sincere interest in the home can help a seller feel comfortable being in escrow with you. Sometimes these letters can be a bit corny, but I’ve often seen them be the reason a seller chooses one buyer over another, even if their price is lower. Remember, a seller may be emotional about saying goodbye to their home. Knowing a buyer values it like they do can be powerful.
Last, terms are so, so, important (sometimes more so than price) but are rarely evaluated equally in a multiple offer situation. Removing all contingencies quickly means the seller has a solid deal. Until that is done, it isn’t even close to a “done deal”. By far the biggest issue in a rising price environment is the appraisal contingency. Just because a buyer offers $10,000 over asking…what happens if the lender’s appraiser doesn’t have recent sales to support it? I’ve spent hours and hours rebutting appraisals in the last 3 years, even after meeting the appraisers in person. Appraisers often don’t value things the way a buyer does. That’s just reality. For this reason, you should remove the appraisal contingency from the deal when possible. It may require the buyer to put more money down if it comes up short, but they don’t pay any more than the price they offered. Buyers, understand why removing the appraisal contingency will often be the reason you get the home – or don’t. Honestly, no one knows value better than a buyer that has been actively looking at every property for sale. They know better than appraisers! For sellers, if the appraisal contingency can’t be removed from the offers, at least shorten the amount of time to get it removed so you know if you have an issue. Sadly, many buyers will tie up a property, then try to renegotiate price when the appraiser suggests they paid more than market value. My feeling is if they are willing to pay over asking because of market conditions then they are going to pay that regardless of what the appraiser says. Get that in writing when you have the leverage to do so – in a multiple offer situation – before you open escrow. Happy selling!
The Santa Clarita Valley Economic Snapshot contains important indicators, data, and statistics about the growth of our region such as construction permits, vacancy rates, residential real estate activity, employment statistics, tourism trends, the economic impact of filming, and local stock prices. To reach the report, click on the link below.
In a few months it will be a New Year and I will be sharing my review of 2016 in Real Estate, and what you might expect for 2017. Spoiler alert, 2016 was the fourth straight year of appreciation bringing many neighborhoods back to where they might have been at the height of the market 10 years ago. Some neighborhoods still aren’t there, but today over 90% of the homeowners in Santa Clarita have equity in their homes and the amount of distress sales is so low there is virtually no risk that we see any kind of a major adjustment in values. Yet, because of a Trump election and a market that seems overheated to many, I’m being asked more and more if an adjustment down in values is likely? The short answer is “no”, but why? Why will our valley perhaps even outperform other areas in California? The answer lies in some fundamental changes that were put in place years ago by a number of forward thinking leaders. These changes broadened and diversified Santa Clarita in almost every area economically and this year end post will share some things you probably didn’t know about our valley, and the why future is bright.
In the early 1990’s, we learned the hard way that jobs and confidence in those jobs was at the core of people’s motivation to buy a home. I started my Real Estate career in 1991 and for 7 straight years we had either a decline or no appreciation in values. It was almost entirely due to jobs, especially in aerospace and manufacturing, leaving the area. That market was also a market in which distress sales existed, though not nearly to the extent of 2006-2012. Remember, 2006-2012 was an anomaly that won’t happen again or even close to it. Why? Because Real Estate values have always been based on supply and demand, and as I will explain here demand for our valley will continue to grow for years to come because of the fundamentals. The keys to appreciation are jobs, interest rates and economic growth in an area, not funny money loans and rampant speculation with no basis in reality. Today, we have neither the speculation nor the easy loans available that drove the crash of 2006-2012. People that can’t afford loans can’t get them today, and that won’t change even if our new President loosens some of the laws. Further, the large amount of homes available 15 years ago has been replaced by a complete shortage. Our inventory in Santa Clarita in 2004-2007 averaged 2000 homes for sale. The last 4 years we have averaged about 500. Still, this last year has seen a slowdown in both the number of homes sold, and the strong appreciation that we experienced in 2013-2015. Many buyers can’t afford today’s prices. If interest rates go up, which is likely for a number of reasons, couldn’t that cool off the market and even lead to price decreases? In the short term it could. In the long term though, values are likely to stay strong and continue to appreciate in Santa Clarita. Here is why:
There are a lot of basics in place that if taken care of, will keep Santa Clarita strong. At the top of the list are outstanding schools and safe neighborhoods. We have our excellent teachers and law enforcement to thank for that, the majority of which live here and have a vested interest in maintaining it. Quality of life is always at the top of a homebuyer’s list when deciding where to raise their family and in all surveys, Santa Clarita shines. People want to live here, move their business here, take a new job here. They want to stay and buyer a bigger/smaller home here. But we had great schools and safe neighborhoods in the 90’s, so what’s better now? Simply stated, our job base. Years ago our city began a concerted effort to draw strong business with good paying jobs to our valley. That was our weakness in 1991-1997? That decline was fueled by TWO major employers leaving the area, Baxter and Lockheed. Today our valley is home to major companies in 7 different sectors at a level never before seen. Entertainment, Tourism, Health Care, Bio Med, Medical Devices, Internet marketing/Digital Media and a much broader manufacturing/Aerospace base have all blossomed here. The service/retail sector is much stronger as well. None of these sectors has more than 18% of the existing jobs here. Due to the efforts of our College, City leaders and the SCVEDC (Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation) all working together to attract new and diverse business, Santa Clarita was just named the #1 city in Los Angeles County for being business friendly. This is just the beginning with a lot more to add to names like Logix, Princess Cruises, Boston Scientific, Sunkist, Disney Ranch, Scorpion Design, Santa Clarita Studios, Quest Diagnostics, Windward and others. No longer can one big aerospace company leave and change the housing market for 2 years like in the 90’s. Santa Clarita has a strong diverse economy that will continue to fuel our housing market. Just look at film as a fun example of Santa Clarita really making progress in the last 20 years. To say that we have become “Hollywood North” is no joke. This year, we have 233 filming days, up 28% from last year. TV, movies, ads, video’s – we see it all here. The economic impact is over $70 million year-to-date. Because we are within the “Thirty Mile Zone” (TMZ), this part of our economy has exploded and we have the stages and natural topography to support a lot more growth in this area. The same can be said of all the sectors – when Advanced Bionics and Boston Scientific became growing community partners here in Santa Clarita, it attracted other similar business. This is what the SCVEDC really does an aggressive job of – attracting businesses of this type that offer desirable, high paying jobs here in Santa Clarita without a big commute involved. Health care has exploded in our valley and as the valley grows (our population is projected to basically double from 215000 to 450,000 by 2050) expect this area to really grow with it. And the list goes on.
In the 1990’s, you could argue we didn’t have the labor or the physical space to support a large, diverse business economy. Neither are true today. College of the Canyons in 1990 started a job training program that today is the envy of the Community College system. Partnering with local businesses to train their employees, these programs cover a huge cross section in both manufacturing and the service sector. Check out their new culinary institute, the food is incredible. Measured by salaries at completion and number of adults going back to college, COC is nationally recognized. We can thank the strong leadership at COC for starting that 25 years ago, today it is an attractive partner to companies looking to relocate that need skilled labor. Also, after years of a tight commercial/industrial market, 2016 brings us over 8 million square feet that is desperately needed for companies that want to move here. In the past, when companies expressed interest, we didn’t always have a place for them. This year that changed with 5 distinct business parks offering space for small to mid-size companies. These are new, well planned, energy efficient buildings, usually much better than what is available elsewhere in the city or Valley. Until recently, availability inventory has been less than 2%. Talk about a tight Real Estate market!
Finally, with the desire of both families and businesses to relocate to Santa Clarita, we need to have more homes available. I encourage you to google “Net Zero Newhall” which is the just announced plan for the long delayed Newhall Ranch. This development which has been in the works for years, will be the first master planned community of its kind. It will be water and energy efficient at a level never before seen to meet the State of California’s ambitious goals. Every home will have solar, an electric charging station for vehicles, all water will come from existing wells and be treated by its own water reclamation facilities paid for by the developer. There is a lot to share and certainly not everyone loves the idea of 16,000 homes off the 126, but this is incredibly well planned & designed, and will be the envy of the building community. With a strong business community, an attractive median income of $92,000, a growing population and an organized group of leaders with a common vision, Santa Clarita looks like winner for long term Real Estate appreciation!
Recently, I was discussing the market with a client and he was worried. “This market just seems….unsustainable,” he said. To be sure, 2016 has been better than expected for most. The market is red hot under $500,000 in Santa Clarita. There are so few properties, especially detached homes, for the amount of buyers waiting, it’s laughable. In the last 90 days, the higher price points of Canyon Country (over $600,000), Saugus (over $700,000) and Stevenson Ranch (over $900,000) have joined the party, with some of the highest numbers in years. Pretty much everywhere in Santa Clarita there aren’t enough quality homes under 1 million. Over that price point is a different story, but under 1 million? Universally, it’s pretty strong. So why was he worried? This is a homeowner, like many in our valley that remembers what happened in 2006-2012. Simply stated we went from a 100% sellers’ market in 2005 to a 100% buyers’ market in 2 years. Prices dropped so much that many neighborhoods are still 20% away from their peaks. He barely held onto his home. He remembers the almost silly euphoria of a market that seemed to have no possible chance of ever correcting; prices seemed to just naturally continue going up and never stopping. Like most of us, he knows that isn’t how Real Estate works.
My client isn’t alone. I have had more people, including Realtors, comment with concern that we MUST be nearing a peak. After all, we have 3 years of straight up appreciation. It will end, wont it? Yes, it will. And there may be a correction of some size when it does. It always happens that way, especially in California where the highs are really high and the lows really low. With all that said, there are virtually none of the factors in place to cause any kind of major correction in the market and I see no reason why the market under $500,000 won’t continue to chug forward in Santa Clarita and most other parts of California. The supply/demand equation is completely out of whack and there are ample buyers that can afford that price point. Affordability becomes a bigger concern over $500,000, but here is why we aren’t anything like 2006 and any correction that comes is likely to be small. First, 2006 was based on funny money loans, investor speculation and factors that not only don’t exist today, they couldn’t. No one has gotten a loan with nothing down that they can’t afford. Next, if some economic issue affected jobs or interest rates (the two biggest normal factors that cause a slump), virtually everyone has equity in their homes, unlike 2006. If they have to sell, they sell and get money. They don’t walk away. That is a BIG difference. Last, rents are so high that if someone didn’t have equity and couldn’t sell at a good price for a few years they can almost always rent their home out and cover their payment. There are many people in Santa Clarita that have done exactly that over the past few years waiting for the market to improve.
So, it’s safe to say we probably are near a peak. Whatever correction we experience will be small or nonexistent under $500,000. My friend owns an $800,000 home. Should he be concerned? It depends. He lives in Northbridge Valencia where the supply/demand equation is also out of whack. Multiple offers are common place and the market defines “frothy”. This describes Fair Oaks Ranch, Stevenson Ranch, parts of Saugus and Castaic and a number of other popular areas in our valley. I would say to many of those people though, that if they are planning to sell I would look VERY carefully at sooner than later. My personal experience is that I have literally hundreds of clients that currently own homes larger than they need. I sold them these homes 10 or 15 years ago and the kids are gone. They don’t need that large a home anymore. But they aren’t selling. Some don’t know where they want to go, or they do but there isn’t much for sale. Or they just aren’t ready to let go. These are all good reasons. Some, however, are waiting for the market to go even higher, and that is where it gets dangerous. You can’t time these things; we’ve certainly learned that. In many cases, money and getting the highest possible price is a big concern. That is certainly understandable but the value of their property hasn’t been this high probably since 2006. No one can predict the future, but history does teach us that the appreciation will stop at some point. Maybe even take a step back. To that group of homeowners, it likely makes sense to make that move sooner than later. It’s tough sometimes making a move you aren’t 100% ready for. It’s tougher to try to make it when you have to and you are competing against dozens of homes instead of 2 or 3.
If there is one thing that continues to smack me between the eyes about Real Estate, it’s that timing is truly everything. In January’s New Year blog, I suggested that 2016 should be a strong year for some sellers because of all the fundamentals – lack of inventory pushing up prices being at the top of the list. I expected, especially in the under $600,000 market, that we could easily see another 5-6% appreciation like we experienced in 2015…and we already have that. Ironically, we actually are behind 2015 April Pendings by about 20%, because of the lack of inventory. This is creating a strange and unusual occurrence in the market. Many people with nice starter homes aren’t selling them, even though they would like to, because there aren’t many available homes to move up to. So they just stay put. Many people with larger homes, with kids out of the house, are ready to downsize. But we don’t have the smaller homes, and especially single story homes that would potentially interest them. So they just stay put. Those that are pursuing moving in a tight market are loving the reaction they get as a seller, and not loving trying to buy in a tight market. The first time buyers are driving the prices up of starter condos and small homes like it was 2004, with multiple offers happening on about anything in decent condition. And because sellers of these properties are fighting over limited quality homes in the $500,000-$800,000 range, that part of the market has caught fire too.
Here are some examples from the first quarter. Condos in parts of Canyon Country that you practically couldn’t give away a few years ago, sell immediately. The 2 bedroom plus loft on Sierra Highway that was at $210,000 last summer is today $250,000. The townhome in Valencia Northbridge that was $325000 last summer is today $370,000 and good luck finding one. In Santa Clarita, if you want to buy something under $300,000 many agents will simply say they can’t help you. For the move up buyers, what was $735,000 in that same Northbridge Valencia area last summer (5 beds and a pool) is today pushing $800,000. In fact, I just closed escrow on 27306 Blueridge at $825,000. It is one of only two sales over $800,000 in the last 2 years, but it won’t be the last. Its been years since homes like that were over $800,000, but they are again, at least for now. Even more head slapping is the Copper Hill North part of Saugus. Last summer there were over 20 homes for sale over 2,500 square feet. Many were on the market over 60 days. Many had to reduce their price to sell. Some didn’t sell and came off the market. Those same homes if they come back on the market now would find only a few homes they compete against and likely sell with virtually no changes in condition or price….simply because they compete against so little compared to last summer. So, as they say, timing is indeed everything.
So why are some homes still sitting, sometimes for months at a time? That can be even more head scratching! In my discussions with other top agents, they have described this market as “weird,” “unpredictable,” “erratic” and my personal favorite “I don’t even know what to tell sellers over $800,000 anymore.” And I’m getting this from agents all around Southern California too. In short, if you have a home in Santa Clarita under $800,000 and it isn’t getting offers, you are either in a weird pocket where there isn’t much demand or there is a problem with your condition. If you are over $800,000 and especially over $1,000,000, the market can be tricky. Sometimes, one home in a neighborhood will sell immediately while others sit for months. In the same neighborhood! A perfect example came last month when I put a single story on the market in Circle J at $1,150,000. There were 5 others on the market, many for months, all without having seen offers. My single story had been on the market before with other agents and hadn’t sold. With a few small changes we sold at almost asking price in 10 days. How would you like to be those other 5 sellers wondering what the heck just happened? On the flip side, I have a terrific Westridge view home for sale at $999,900 with plenty of showings. Four agents have called me stating they expect to write an offer and not one has. Because of the lack of competing homes, it wouldn’t surprise me if I bring the seller two offers out of the blue…or that it takes me another 6 weeks to sell it. It’s just that unpredictable in this part of the market. Buyers looking, maybe not always offering. I am seeing this finally start to change though. There is so little for sale in Stevenson Ranch that homes that would have been $750,000 6 months ago are coming on the market at $850,000. I’m showing them because there isn’t anything else to show our buyers! Are they overpriced? Maybe, but if they sell, maybe not. The sellers of those starter homes that are buying and driving up prices in Saugus in the $700,000+ market are starting to be seen in the slightly higher price points of Westridge and Stevenson Ranch. Again, timing is truly everything, and in the over one million market, patience may be mandatory.